Montana State Representative David Moore has filed legislation (HB365) to make wearing yoga pants (and other form fitting clothing) in public illegal. This was inspired by a naked bike ride through town. Not his.
Here’s an article with more details: http://time.com/3705394/montana-yoga-pants-ban/
But I’ve got one question for Representative Moore:
Because if so, maybe I’m in.
Follow me on Twitter at Patience Burke@TameTheGorilla.
For the second consecutive year, Florida State Senator Jeff Brandes (R – St. Petersburg), has filed legislation that would legalize the unlicensed carrying of concealed weapons during a state of emergency, where the Governor or local authority has issued a mandatory evacuation order.
Senator Brandes was unable to be reached for comment on SB 290, but it’s clear that he is interested in advancing his constituents’ ability to protect themselves.
His empathy is commendable, but unfortunately misplaced. Bad stuff doesn’t happen in Florida anymore.
Florida hasn’t been hit by a hurricane since 2005, so nobody worries about them anymore. Overall violent crime in the state has gone down 60 percent since 1993, meaning that most people don’t even lock their doors.
The major effects of climate change are a century away – and in support of the recent legalization of gay marriage – Texas Governor Rick Perry and New Jersey Governor Chris Christie started courting Florida Governor Rick Scott for his affections at this month’s gubernatorial inauguration.
Life is good!
In other words, there is no conceivable reason to preemptively apply for and receive a concealed weapons license to protect oneself in the event that Florida falls victim to a natural disaster or manmade catastrophe.
Gun hating liberals and soy eaters would have you believe that this justifies getting rid of guns altogether. Why have guns if the world is a totally non-chaotic and equally resource distributed place to live?
I’ll tell you why. Because this is America, and you fucking can.
I tease. But frankly, a gun in the hands of a properly trained and responsible individual can be fun. There are few thrills like plinking leaves floating downstream, or blowing the balls off of the bear you drew on the mattress somebody left at the unofficial quarry “dump.”
Pumpkins gone rotten several months after Halloween deserve to die in the glory that only a 12 gauge with 00 buckshot can provide. And when that deer looks at me funny, he’s coming home to feed my family for the next month.
Guns have a place in this country, but I think we all agree that it’s not in the hands of lunatics, criminals, and small children.
So maybe there is some common ground we can find with the organic cotton wearing pansies who buy their meat at Whole Foods, if they eat meat at all. I mean, a lot of them wear spandex when they ride bikes, but one of them did jump my battery when it died after rocking out too long to Skynyrd at the boat ramp.
Apparently, if you are 21 years of age and not a felon (or other violent offender), you’re going to get your license. The Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (DACS) is responsible for issuing concealed weapons licenses. If you meet those criteria, don’t suffer from mental or physical infirmaries that would prevent the safe operation of a weapon, and aren’t addicted to drugs, you’re probably golden.
You do have to demonstrate competence with a firearm – such as by having taken a hunter’s ed course – but I say that’s a fair enough requirement. You’ve seen that yahoo at the shooting range that looks down the barrel to check the jam, or talks with a pistol like some folks talk with their hands. Evidently, that guy’s daddy didn’t teach him to respect a firearm. For my sake and yours, someone probably ought to before he waltzes into church with one strapped to his person.
At last count, nearly 1.4 million people have been issued concealed weapons licenses in Florida. It costs up to $70, and you have to get fingerprinted and have a background check. But it’s good for 7 years.
DACS gets 90 days to affirm or deny an application. But even if an emergency did hit during that timeframe, there is another way. According to s. 790.251, F.S., the “Preservation and Protection of the Right to Keep and Bear Arms in Motor Vehicles Act of 2008,” you can keep your gun and your ammunition locked up in your car.
Remember, the point of SB 290 was to expand your right to carry unlicensed only during times of mandatory evacuation. Unless you’re walking away from that flood, you’re probably already covered.
I reached out to the Florida Sheriffs Association to get its take on the bill. It hasn’t yet taken a position, but is “looking closely…to decide where we stand and what is in the best interest of public safety.” If I were a betting lady, I’d hedge that the Association isn’t the bill’s biggest fan. After all, SB 290 rather directly conflicts with s. 870.044, F.S., which states that when a sheriff has declared a local state of emergency as result of a clear and present danger to the public, the intentional possession of a firearm by a civilian in public is illegal.
This isn’t a call to arms against responsible gun ownership. But as for the person who says, “hmmm…there’s a hurricane coming, the river’s flooding over, and frogs are falling from the sky…meh, I’m staying,” yeah, that person needs to be checked out.
We’re talking guns here, and foresight should count for something.
Follow me on Twitter at Patience Burke@TameTheGorilla.
The following was not drafted by TameTheGorilla. It is a guest opinion from Phil Buchanan of Pine Island, FL – pseudo-retired attorney and civic leader. For context, first is an email excerpt describing his inability to get certain press coverage. This is followed by his proposed Letter to the Editor. He can be contacted at coolcherokee@comcast.net for more information. (Apologies for formatting issues.)
This week, The Hill contributor Allan J. Lichtman writes about “a shattering new study (that finds) ordinary Americans have virtually no impact…on the making of national policy in our country.”
Shattering? That’s really not the word I would use. Is it shattering that the sun rises? Surprising that earth spins? No. We’ve come to expect it. But interesting, I’ll give you that.
The study was conducted by pronounced university professors Martin Gilens of Princeton and Benjamin Page of Northwestern. It is due out in full this fall.
Mr. Lichtman, a professor himself at the American University in Washington, likely was privy to a sneak peak. He continues that “the influence of ordinary Americans registers at a “non-significant, near-zero level”…(while the) rich individuals and business-dominated interest groups dominate the policymaking process.”
Again, I don’t think this qualifies as “news” for the majority of Americans. Most of us already possess a healthy level of pessimism where political influence is concerned. But don’t let my sans-coffee, cranky musings diminish the importance of what Mr. Lichtman promotes.
Indeed, this “should be a loud wake-up call to the vast majority of Americans…bypassed by their government.” Yes, “the relationship between the people and our government” must be changed.
But how?
Mr. Lichtman describes an apathetic public, one where more and more Americans are opting not to vote, not to participate. Somewhere, our country fell off the civic bandwagon.
So, what does it take to spark a revolution?
I’ll point you back to a 1972 political theory called the Downs Model. It was the basis for much of my college thesis and is something I refer to whenever I need to sound smart. It is my fix-all for virtually any governmental or social ill and is the only political theory I can identify by name.
The genesis of the model is quite simple: crisis breeds opportunity. Change follows catastrophe.
With these crises come “windows of opportunity.” Every sinking ship needs a plug, so the first shipmate to show up with a giant piece of cork wins. People aren’t so picky during times of emergency.
But the window won’t stay open forever. No patch kit? Well, there goes humanity. Opportunities are just as easily missed due to the fact that no one stepped up with a solution. Or, on the contrary, someone stepped up with a bad one.
Mr. Lichtman suggests non-elites pool their moderate resources into competing political action committees (PACs)…meet thy enemy head on in the war of political fundraising.
I’ve got to admit, PACs and Super PACs straight up give me the willies. Even for a cause I believe in, it just feels wrong. Could it be a transparent Super PAC that doesn’t eat meat and that hugs bunnies?
Frankly, I don’t have an alternative for the masses. I’ll think on it, if you will. But remember, time’s a wastin’. Do as Mr. Lichtman suggests, and act now! This is a limited time offer – it won’t last forever!
Follow me on Twitter at Patience Burke@TameTheGorilla.
Like when your mom volunteered to chaperone your senior year class trip, SB 1714 is a real downer for the Florida craft beer industry.
The bill as amended would seriously restrict the ability of Florida’s breweries to sell their wares directly to consumers. In many cases, it would increase the cost of doing business by requiring breweries to sell their bottled concoctions to a beer distributor before buying it back at a marked up cost. Only then could the breweries sell it in-house.
While not technically a fee, Senator Jack Latvala (R- Clearwater) equated it to “paying protection to Vinnie in New York.” Bill sponsor, Senator Kelli Stargel (R-Lakeland) admitted in the Senate Community Affairs committee that craft breweries aren’t paying this cost now, which means this bill represents a brand new fee on Florida’s businesses.
Senator Stargel asserts vulnerability of her preferred three-tier system: manufacturer, distributor, and vendor. If breweries are allowed to sell directly to consumers, the argument goes, what’ll come of the other tiers!? It’s essential, she continues, for government to step in and regulate the way these companies do business.
Gone would be the days of driving to Tampa for my (Cigar City) Jai Alai, Gainesville for my (Swamp Head) Stump Knocker, and Tallahassee for my (Proof) Robust Porter. I guess I’ll have to settle for the convenience and gas efficiency of my corner ABC store.
Senator Stargel – climate change champion!
Although, using Stargel’s logic, one has to wonder if homebrewers might at some point find themselves on the radar. Homebrewing is an increasingly popular hobby, and one can’t deny the risk that it poses to the three tiers. If people are making and drinking their own beer, the entire framework of the tiers may very well collapse.
Given this imminent danger, I was curious to know whether this three-tier logic applied elsewhere in Florida. I reached out to the Florida Department of Agricultural and Consumer Services, and was informed that Florida farmers are not required to pay an additional fee or tax to sell their products directly to the consumer.
It sounds like Publix needs better lobbyists.
But regardless of that threat, it would be surprising if Governor Scott gives Stargel his stamp of approval. The Governor has been very consistent in his opposition to any new fees and taxes on Florida’s businesses.
You might recall last session when Governor Scott vetoed HB 265, which would have increased the fee for purchasing a wildflower license plate by $10. Heck, one of the Administration’s primary goals this year has been to return $500 million in fees and taxes back to the “Florida families and job creators.”
SB 1714 reeks of cumbersome regulation and poorly veiled attempts to monopolize the burgeoning craft beer industry of Florida. If a companion bill makes it through the House, that alone should beckon the Governor’s veto.
Follow me on Twitter at Patience Burke@TameTheGorilla.
I’ve got a brilliant idea to make some money. There’s this Jewish neighborhood down the street from me, and I think it’s the perfect place to put a pork BBQ joint. Or better yet, I’m thinking of opening up a University of Florida paraphernalia shop on Stadium Drive. I’m gonna’ be rich. Any takers?
Last Sunday, members of the Tallahassee community met at the corner of Crump and Miccosukee Roads to discuss their collective outrage over a proposed gas station located just across the street from the Crump trailhead parking lot of the Miccosukee Greenway. Residents in attendance expressed concern about changes the gas station could make to the area. They worried over the possibility of increased traffic, groundwater contamination, light pollution, etc.
Several of the more heavily engaged citizens sat as a panel and facilitated the bulk of this discussion by taking questions from the audience and by offering their own opinions on the situation. These “community organizers” – if you’ll forgive my tongue in cheek, dry sense of humor – focused on one point, perhaps more than others. The lack of economic sustainability.
A large 20-pump gas station, equipped with a car wash, doesn’t seem like an economically viable business venture on the rural corner of Crump and Miccosukee, they argued. What happens to the site if this thing goes belly up? The panel asserted that the amount of vehicular traffic passing the location amounts to approximately 15% of what the Florida Department of Transportation standards suggest as necessary to support this business.
Which brings me back to my original question… Any venture capitalists out there want to fund my University of Florida sweatshirt and bumper sticker store?
More often than not, things are what they appear to be. Mr. William G. Brown, the gentleman who purchased the site of the proposed gas station, is most likely a very savvy businessman. A savvy businessman who would not spend the $70,000 he spent purchasing the property – and however much it would cost to construct a gas station – without believing that he would get a good return on his investment.
In the case of the proposed gas station, this means that Mr. Brown needs additional passersby from somewhere, in order to keep the business afloat. If the community organizers are correct in their assertions, those numbers aren’t there today.
However, a quick look at the Leon County Property Appraiser website shows that there are thousands of nearby, undeveloped acres owned by entities with vague and nondescript names such as Powerhouse, Inc., CNL Tallahassee, and TOE2, Inc. Mr. Brown himself owns about a hundred acres just south of the proposed site.*
Maybe this was just a bad business decision. But if you believe that, I’ve got a bridge I’d like to sell you.
*(Note: property records reflect a Mr. Brown and a Mr. Brown, Sr., but both are listed as having the same address.)
Follow me on Twitter at Patience Burke@TameTheGorilla.
Last week, I found myself wondering who really benefits from the many millions of dollars that are raised and spent by super PACs. For the most part, I’ve assumed it was the candidates, their parties, and the special interest groups who fund these enterprises.
You know, an interest group gives money to a super PAC. The super PAC spends money (indirectly) promoting a candidate or party platform. The candidate gets elected and makes decisions in favor of the interest group’s priorities. Rinse and repeat.
But step back for a moment. Think of how these dollars are spent. Election cycles increasingly bring in ungodly amounts of advertising dollars. The Wall Street Journal reported that for the 2012 elections, super PACs spent more than half a billion dollars. That’s in addition to the millions spent by the candidates and parties themselves.
Clearly, the influence of super PACs on our political system is very troubling. But perhaps there is another middleman – aside from super PACs – about whom we need to be concerned.
The sheer amount of money being spent on campaign ads gives cable companies and broadcast networks major skin in the game. They have a lot to gain from the campaign season and from the unabashed use of super PAC dollars to influence politics.
Last Saturday, Matea Gold of the Washington Post wrote about the Democrats’ increasing reliance on super PAC fundraising. She reported that the board for Priorities USA, a key Democratic super PAC, now includes an executive from Viacom, as well as a lobbyist for Comcast. Interesting.
In the world of super PAC haters, the Koch brothers and Sheldon Adelson are low hanging fruit. It’s really easy to demonize them for using their mega wealth to influence politics. But what about the television networks that accept this money and run these ads? They, too, deserve our scorn, as they are perpetuating this revolting trend.
Like bookies who take bets on dog fights. They may not own the dogs, but they’re still culpable for the harm.
Follow me on Twitter at Patience Burke@TameTheGorilla.
Appeared in Tallahassee Democrat under title “Huge Workload Makes for Bad Legislation.”
Florida’s Legislature is bursting at the seams. In 2011 and again in 2012, members of the Florida Senate and House of Representatives filed more than 2,000 pieces of legislation. Last year’s session was relatively light, with only 1,898 bills being filed.
Florida’s legislative session is just 60 days long. Common sense dictates that no Senator or Representative could get through the 900-1,000+ bills filed in his or her chamber well enough to understand, much less vote on them. It is true that many bills get filed early and that not every bill makes it through the committee process. But remember that most members are juggling fulltime jobs, in addition to their legislative responsibilities. Despite the assistance of hard working and very talented legislative staff, Florida’s legislative workload is larger than our elected officials can handle.
That puts us all at risk. The legislature is where our laws get made, the laws by which we agree to live as a society. The process needs to be deliberate and thoughtful. But with those numbers, it’s impossible to meet that mark.
Working over capacity makes us vulnerable. Legislation is hard to write and hard to analyze. Drafting errors can have major consequences. For example, I’m not entirely sure whether the computer I’m using to type this column is legal. That’s because in last year’s legislative session, a broadly written slot machine bill may accidentally have made computers illegal in Florida. Smart phones, too.
But that was an accident. Unfortunately, the fast paced, high volume nature of the Florida legislature also makes it susceptible to exploitation. Unscrupulous interests, wise to how things operate can manipulate the situation by offering seemingly harmless, innocuous sounding language that gets put into bills. This is risky business. You may as well be inviting Bernie Madoff to a cocktail hour for eager new investors.
To be clear, I’m not pessimistic about lobbyists as a class. Not everyone plays that game. But there are good people in this world, and there are bad people. And when bad people get into positions of power… Besides, no one hires a lobbyist without a reason. They are expensive. And some intentionally downplay the significance of their proposed language, which should be a red flag to anyone paying attention.
Which again, is my point – you can’t find a leak when it’s raining.
The rushing torrent of session makes legislative review a hard lift. This reality puts members in a tough spot. There must be an inherent pressure to vote yea or nay, regardless of whether or not that official possesses a sufficient understanding of the legislation. Frankly, I’d rather see members abstain from voting altogether than see them vote on bills about which they cannot possibly have had the time to adequately consider.
I suspect many members often end up triaging to focus on the bills they find most important. It’s an open question what they base their votes on the rest of the time. Mind you, Florida isn’t alone on this. Other states do it, too – not to mention Congress. (You may recall the recent passage of that massive omnibus spending bill that came just days after the final text was released. Did congressional members actually read that? Yeah, right.)
But just because everyone does something, doesn’t make it right. We all know this. If we identify a problem, we have an obligation to fix it. This is particularly the case when dealing with something as sacred as the laws that govern our society.
Perhaps bills should be work-shopped longer prior to filing. Maybe the total number of amendments and bills filed needs to be made more restrictive. Review could be made easier by preventing multiple companion and placeholder bills. There are lots of ways the system could be improved. Reform just needs to be made a priority.
Follow me on Twitter at Patience Burke@TameTheGorilla.
